Cswip 3.2 Questions And Answers Jun 2026
| Feature | RT | UT | |--------|----|----| | Principle | Differential absorption of X/gamma rays | Sound wave reflection from discontinuities | | Output | 2D shadow image | A-scan, B-scan, or C-scan signal | | Sensitivity | Best for volumetric defects (porosity, slag) | Best for planar defects (cracks, lack of fusion) | | Orientation limitation | Planar defects parallel to beam may be missed | Perpendicular defects are detected well | | Safety | Radiation hazard | No radiation hazard | | Cost & speed | Slower, expensive | Fast, cheaper per inspection | | Surface prep | Minimal | Requires smooth, clean surface with couplant | | Record | Permanent film/digital image | Signal trace (can be recorded) |
Answer: Relying on experience without referencing the specific code clause. For example, answering “undercut is bad” instead of quoting “AWS D1.1 Clause 6.9 – maximum undercut depth 1/32 inch.” Always cite the standard. cswip 3.2 questions and answers
Immediately stop their work, remove them from the site, and notify their agency. You must then identify and re-inspect all work previously signed off by that individual. | Feature | RT | UT | |--------|----|----|
Answer: Tungsten inclusion (from GTAW) if small and dense; or wormhole porosity if elongated. If dark with sharp edges, it may be lack of penetration. A CSWIP 3.2 must know to confirm with visual and possibly UT. You must then identify and re-inspect all work
Answer:
